All life revolves around the elementary need to survive, grow and replicate. In order to go through our daily routines, we must all consume a palette of nutrients that our bodies can digest and utilize. What we eat is converted into energy or stored for use later on. If we balance our diets, then what is ingested will also include chemical compounds that are vital to our metabolisms and must be sourced externally. These are often referred to as “supplements” and can include an array of vitamins, amino acids, etc.
However, living things also require chemical compounds or biochemicals that cannot be obtained from the outside world. Instead, the body must make these on its own. When we are at the peak of our physical being, we are able to synthesize sufficient quantities of these biochemicals for all of our processes to work beautifully. Examples of some of these self-produced biochemicals are: hormones, regulators and enzymes.
Unfortunately, when we age or if we unduly stress one of our functional systems, the level of biochemicals we depend upon to keep us in good repair becomes challenged. This biochemical deficiency can lead to premature aging or ill health. Consequently as we grow older, or if we engage in practices that put undue stress on the systems of our bodies, there will be a need to increase the unacceptably low levels of these active chemicals. This augmentation is known as “replenishment”.
Skeletal System
The skeletal system of our bodies serves several different functions. These include:
Providing a means of structural support so we can stand and move.
Producing red blood cells.
Protecting the vital organs.
Acting as a chemical repository for calcium and phosphorous.
A healthy skeletal system is essential. When something goes wrong with the skeletal system it impacts our entire state of well being. Unfortunately, about 10 million people in North America have the most common type of bone disease, known as osteoporosis. As the population ages and the boomers move into their late forties and fifties, bone health becomes an ever increasing battle. As we get older, the scarcity of certain self-synthesized biochemicals results in an imbalance in the withdrawal and deposits to the bone storehouse. The result is that everyday we are removing more minerals from our bones than we replace. Over time, this deficit results in a loss of bone material that is significant enough to cause fragility and brittleness.
Additionally, life style choices such as alcohol consumption, smoking and obesity put stress on the skeletal system and can lead to a deficiency of the naturally created biochemicals needed to adequately maintain the health and density of our bones.
Dr. Narain Naidu
Recently Narain Naidu, PhD (Medicine), in collaboration with colleges from the University of Southern California, the Western University of Health Sciences and N-terminus Research Laboratory, has published a paper in the journal Osteoporosis International. It examines the ability of natural proteins from milk to replenish the lack of self-synthesized biochemicals in post-menopausal women.
Dr. Naidu is a medical microbiologist with over 25 years of research experience in the field of bioactive compounds and their effects on our well being. He has served as a professor at universities in Europe, Asia and the U.S. Dr. Naidu is a fellow or member of numerous professional and scientific societies. He consults with public health agencies and runs his own biotechnology company.
Perhaps Dr. Naidu should be known as “Dr. Lactoferrin” since he has led the research on these compounds since the mid-1980s and has published over 50 peer-reviewed articles on the subject. The following is a short review of his latest publication.
Osteoporosis International Article
The article entitled, “Milk ribonuclease-enriched lactoferrin induces positive effects on bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women” is published in the latest issue of Osteoporosis International.
[Copyright laws preclude the opportunity to provide a link to the entire article. However, by accessing the “Pubmed” site and searching for “Naidu lactoferrin” a copy of the publication abstract can be downloaded.]
Objective:
Look for a way to treat osteoporosis without inducing the harmful effects of existing pharmaceutical approaches.
Premise:
Since certain natural milk proteins, along with ribonuclease and lactoferrin can promote the formation of new bone and blood vessels test their ability to improve bone health.
Experimental Design:
Conduct a placebo-controlled and randomized study to examine the effects of ribonuclease enriched lactoferrin (R-ELF) on patients in the primary target group.
Patient Selection:
The study was limited to post-menopausal women who were in good health. Those included in the study all passed the inclusion/ exclusion criteria set by the study protocol. As an example, participants currently undergoing treatment for bone disease were not included since their results could not be clearly interpreted as due to the R-ELF.
In all, 38 women were enrolled in the study:
Approach:
The enrollees were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group received both the R-ELF compound as well as a calcium supplement, while the placebo group received only the calcium supplement. Blood and urine samples were obtained from each of the individuals at the beginning of the study. Similarly, blood and urine samples were also taken on day 15, day 30, day 60, day 90 and finally on the last day of the study which was day 180.
Since bone density measurements are cumbersome, time consuming and operator dependent, a more direct, accurate and reproducible approach was used in the study. Namely, the blood and urine samples were tested for chemicals indicative of bone growth and resorption (mineral withdrawal). The idea was to look for bone growth activity, since it would signify a re-depositing of bone material. as well as a better managed rate of withdrawal (resorption).
Bone formation can be tracked by analyzing the blood’s serum for two chemical “markers”. These are bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (sBAP) as well as osteocalcin (sOC). Bone loss, or mineral withdrawal, was monitored by looking at N-telopeptides (sNTx) in the serum and free deoxypyridinoline in the urine (uDPD).
The idea here was to see if the R-ELF and calcium supplement would not only cause the mineral withdrawal from the bone to be moved to a more favorable rate, but also to investigate whether or not minerals would be re-deposited.
Results:
R-ELF supplementation showed an increase in bone formation in both markers when compared to the placebo results. Similarly, the bone resorption markers demonstrated that the rate at which minerals were being withdrawn from the bone decreased with the use of R-ELF.
For all of these graphs, the “unfilled” squares show the data for the placebo group, while the “filled” squares represent the experimental group.
Bottom-line:
Ribonuclease-enriched lactoferrin (R-ELF) shows a significant reduction in bone loss and an increase in bone formation activity when taken with a calcium supplement.
» 19 Comments
1Comment at Wednesday, 25 February 2009 05:25by dchang
This study is really encouraging. I would, however, like to make clear a few points: 1. OsteoDenx is a product ith RNAse enriched-lactoferrin, correct? (Of course it also has other ingredients.) 2. In Presentations by Nikken leaders and testimonials by wellness consultants they talked about OsteoDenx - how it helps bone to be strong, etc. 3. In Dr. Naidu's material abeve he talked about R-ELF and lactoferrin. 4. Is a person must use both OsteoDenx and Lactoferrin Gold but not OsteoDenx only to be effective? (Of course, one need to have a good calcium at the same time) Some clarification would be very helpful.
2Comment at Tuesday, 10 March 2009 16:18by wellnaturally
I agree with this question above - have found the material from Dr. Naidu to be confusing as it points to the efficacy of Lactoferrin but nothing about the OsteoDenx - does one only need Lactoferrin? Hope we get a response to this question :)
3Comment at Wednesday, 18 March 2009 01:05by stenslan
By stenslan Is the Lactoferrin in Osteo Denx different than Lactoferrin Gold? Also can these be used along with the prescriptions now being given for bone problems, including the one given IV?
4Comment at Friday, 20 March 2009 19:51by davebalzer
Have you checked the labelling on the OsteoDenx box? You answer is there, I believe. If not, kindly let me know.
5Comment at Saturday, 28 March 2009 12:07by Rolfeman
From my research there are 29 different lactoferrins. The one in Osteodenx is for the bones and the one in Lactoferrin Gold is for the intestinal track. If we can understand that all foods go through the intestine then for nutriants to go further the intestine must be working properly. With the vast numbers of un-healthy people and related dis-orders we should all work on the intestines as a first line of defence. The beauty of the Bio-Replenishments are they target exactly where they are supposed to go and provide exactly what that part of our system needs. Remember this is a whole new area for nutritional health. Best Dave Rolfe
6Comment at Thursday, 23 April 2009 19:07by Gail
I have a question asked of me by a nurse who is very interested in Nikken's Bio-Replenishments: Lactoferrin and OsteoDenx. Here is the question: and Thank you in advance! I just wanted to follow up per our conversation today at the expo at Highlands Behavior Health Systems. I was wondering how the products we spoke about would be utilized by someone who is post gastric bypass, whether it is recent or several years post op? I know that osteoporosis is a real concern because absorption of nutrients remains a constant difficulty for gastric bypass patients. I had Roux NY gastric bypass in 8/2002. Does the lactoferrin work the same when digestion occurs differently and therefore absorption of certain minerals may be deferred or even inhibited? Post gastric bypass patients take medication differently and have a primarily protein heavy diet, eating frequent small meals. Does this play a role?
7Comment at Saturday, 13 June 2009 16:01by wellbob
I have a basic question regarding the initial test results for both the placebo group and the experiment group. I am wondering why the initial readings (day 0) are different for the two groups if they were selected at random> I would have expected nearly identical initial test results before the experiment was underway. I AM NOT a scientist (only an aerospace engineer), but I would like to be enlightened. Thank you.
8Comment at Wednesday, 17 June 2009 15:04by proactivewellness
I understand that Nikken's Calcium Plus was not used in the study. What was the amount of calcium given to these women?
9Comment at Thursday, 25 June 2009 18:22by annewilson
Would a person with Ankylosing spondylitis benefit from using Osteodenx or would it hurt that situation?
10Comment at Sunday, 02 August 2009 09:24by Debiben
Anne, of course we can't proclain specifiics per diagnosis. But it would not hurt the situation. R-ELF is a naturally occuring compound that is a potentiator for re-building. The body works to maintain homeostasis; fighting insults from the enviornment, poor nutrition, stress, etc. Providing the body through replenishment one of the most basic compounds needed will aid the body in ways we don't yet even know!
11Comment at Saturday, 29 August 2009 03:10by diamondronna
I have read that are 28 or 29 lactoferrins in the body. I've also read that lactoferrin will att ack pathogens and render them powerless by binding with the organism's iron, and then it's excreted from the body. My question is, if osteoferrin does that in the bone and lactoferrin /gold in the gut, does that mean internal invaders elsewhere are not affected by lactoderrin in the body, period? Or do they go where they need to go? It's unclear to me.
12Comment at Saturday, 29 August 2009 03:12by diamondronna
I have client that has MS and wants to take Osteodenx. She read that lactoferrin is an immunity booster. With her MS, she said she can't take anything that boosts the immune system as it raises havoc with her MS. Your thoughts?
13Comment at Sunday, 06 September 2009 13:40by heidilane
If someone has too much calcium in the blood stream due to a purported para-thyroid gland problem, should one still take the Kenzen Calcium plus along with the OsteoDenx and Lactoferrin Gold 1.8? If not, then approximately how long could it take the OsteoDenx to bring the blood calcium levels back into balance so one can take the Kenzen Calcium plus?
14Comment at Wednesday, 09 September 2009 11:22by oscardperez
HI,
I agree with well bob, It is not clear why the initial sampling give differences between groups at day 0. this could show that the groups are not that homogeneous as the study implies. Actually because of the graphics it can be said that there is a significant difference from the start between the placebo and R-ELF group. It should be run an statistical calculation to clear that tests differences do not express statistical difference among groups thus they are homogeneous. In addition , It is not clear why the two bone growth markers sBAP and the OC have contradictory (tendency)graphics. the evidence that is presented does not suggest that the bone growth but the bone-loss is lesser by lactoferrin. A bone density study would be definitively conclusive.
Also , I would lke to see an statement saying that the study statistically concludes that the lactoferrin significantly generates bone growth or significantly reduce bone loss. Graphics by itself are good indicators, only.
15Comment at Wednesday, 16 September 2009 17:56by JudyGlass
Has anyone experienced a stomach problem with someone taking OsteoDenx? I have a friend who experienced this on the third day, and this has happened more than once.
16Comment at Wednesday, 10 March 2010 18:37by cindyburridge
I understand that there is shellfish in the Osteo-denx. Does this cause a problem for people allergic to shellfish Thank you
17"history of tamoxifen Brownsville" at Sunday, 14 March 2010 10:54by Maymngeme
phoenix labs tamoxifen citrate Virginia Beach tamoxifen citrate tablets Yonkers
18Comment at Wednesday, 31 March 2010 23:24by overells
We are interested to know why Nikken has gone from Calcium Plus, with calcium hydroxy-apatite, the best form of bio-available calcium, to Cal-Denx, which contains the significantly inferior calcium carbonate. We just did a test on a Cal-Denx (bullet!) tablet and no observable dissolution had started after 30 minutes soaking in vinegar. In addition, the Calcium Plus was a gel capsule, which was easily absorbed, whereas the new tablets are quite hard and much more difficult to digest. I tried crunching a new one up in my mouth and it, of course, tasted like chalk!!
As a consequence, we will not be purchasing the new CalDenx (nor promoting it as distributors), but we will seek a better form of calcium for our 50+ bones.
Any clarification on this seemingly backward step by Nikken would be much appreciated.
Steve & Linda Overell, Calgary, AB.
19Comment at Wednesday, 07 April 2010 14:24by microscopy
For the Overells regarding Caldenx Watch the webinar January 6, 2010 on the mynikken site?? Dr. Naidu explains his choice of calcium carbonate /citrate based on years of cutting edge research. The initial study used generic calcium carbonate and the results were impressive. Dr. Naidu did an extensive study in Holland with the Caldenx on 740 subjects and the dexascans showed even more dramatic results. Dr. Naidu is a world renowned expert in the Tx of Osteoporosis. Nikken has not made a backward step. They are relyig on Dr. Naidu's expertise and scientific results. The tablet is meant to dissolve according to the metabolic pathways necessary for optimal absorption. The DDT (Dissolution & Disintegration Test) is not always definitive, especially with Calcium supplements. One study suggests the vinegar needs to be 99F and agitaion applied. (I'm a Live Cell Microscopist and familiar with the DDT) I will enthusiatically promote the Caldenx, not on blind faith but the science behi
» Post Comment
Only registered users can write a comment. Please login or register.